One word - marketing. Perceptions depend mainly on marketing.
whysub01 wrote:The company develop a new bike, using their own engine rather than using someone else's. This costs BIG, BIG Bucks.
Turns out the engine is a stormer, the bikes (S, ST & SF) are well built, handle, look good and look like they will outlast some other big twins.
So why are the public not buying them? I put it down to the incorrectly perceived view of MZ building cheap commuter bikes.
Or they've never heard of them.
But that raises a question: are they buying Chinese bikes and scooters, names they've never heard of? Scooters? Maybe a different market segment to whom name brand is not as important as price, and bike image is not the same as scooter image.
whysub01 wrote:Look at Skoda-been building (assembling?) great cars, which only recently have been accepted as mainstream. As for Enfield, how the hell they keep selling the most shoddily built bikes (apart from CCM) in the UK amazes me
The stories about Royal Enfield build quality and so on vary. ...... The paintwork (on the new ones I've seen in India) is excellent, and excellent hand pin-striping.
This morning I was talking to a friend about the ..suitability and reliability of small Japanese offroad/trail bikes like the TTR230 and CRF230, XT225 ... and I said (and not the first time) that I would still take a 180-200cc Japanese bike over the traditional Enfield for touring in India - because it would be reliable, they can take a beating, the gears or the clutch or whatever wouldn't break.
whysub01 wrote:Hopefully, BIKE magazine here are doing a piece on the 1000 in the next month or so-hopefully, it will raise some awareness that not every great big twin has sticky out cylinders!
They get a fair amount of attention, given the lack of marketing and so on.
whysub01 wrote:Similarly, the Baggi/Mastiff is always overlooked when, for instance, RIDE magazine looks at alternative bikes to commute on, then choose a Husaberg
, aKTM Duke (one of the vibiest singles I have ever ridden) and a Honda FMX (all 37 weedy horsepower and an 18 year old aircooled engine to boot)-no mention of the MZ, which has to be THE commuter Supermoto.
Do they still make them? afaik, all the new ones are 2003/ 2004 models. We have a dealer in SA now - Classic Cars (I think) in Johannesburg. I saw them listed on the MZ factory website and I asked them about the 125 and they said they were waiting for a shipment which would arrive in Frebruary. Now I see they ran an ad in the main bike magazine. (Including the Baghira.)
...They chose a Husaberg as a commuter bike?
pf! Typical bike magazine arseholes. ok, it would be a great bike for commuting - except for the maintenance - LOL! - but it's a racing bike, it's pretty much a racing bike.
ok, I'd commute on one, sure. I'd have bought one if I'd had the money, but they cost more than the Husqvarna and I didn't have enough for that. But, I didn't know that the maintenance / oil change schedule was even more than the KTM RFS, and I wouldn't be using it every day, and I'm only 15 minutes away from work - in a car.