breakwellmz wrote:I seen it mentioned several times that the smaller sprocket should be avoided for this reason.If so, why do Yamaha in their wisdom produce a sprocket this size?
mincehead wrote:Yamaha care not, they`re just reacting to requests from dealers and owners.
Many Raptor 660 owners use a 14 tooth sprocket, It may not be our motor but it's similar. Yamaha aren't stupid and if fitting smaller front sprockets caused breakage don't you think the Yam Forums would be full of complaints and that some enterprising young lawyer would have launched a
Class Action by now?
Smaller sprockets are safe - not that I'd fit one.
DAVID THOMPSON wrote:15 is hard on the output shaft 16 on front and bigger on rear makes front last longer
dave
mincehead wrote:The least angle a chain runs at between sprockets, the longer it will last and the less load is applied to bearings.
I quite agree, it's just Maths. That's still not why I wouldn't use a smaller front sprocket.
Around about 3,700 rpm I, and I believe many others get
chain rattle. If I fitted a smaller front sprocket then the chain would be even closer to the swinging arm ....
So, would I fit a larger rear sprocket - no.
In beautifully rural Dorset I spend a lot of my time on the backroads, B, C, and D roads - love 'em. But when I'm going somewhere, I use A and M roads, and on those M roads - or M ways - top is wonderful. Why lower the gearing, making first unusable, when I can enjoy myself in 3rd and 4th and change in to top when I need to get somewhere quick.
Being
in top isn't important - being in the right gear is.
Right, back to the Cricket.