Arny, no, I'm not so certain I can find any advance curve that is indisputably linked with Vape or Powerdynamo ignitions for these 2T engines. True, there are some curves on the internet, but I'm not sure what those are for. Particularly Powerdynamo has shown some curves, but those are for 4T engines. For 2T engines, have a look here:
http://www.powerdynamo.biz/eng/kb/2strokeadvance.htm. See that there is up to 10° retarding (not advancement) at very low RPM; that is due to the nature of the electronic parts used. But that low RPM retardation helps starting, in that it reduces kickback. However, normally no high RPM advancement on 2T ignitions.
Guesi, thank you for that graph. It is not an advance curve, instead it shows the ignition timing, in ms bTDC, as a function of the engine RPM. An important part of that graph are 2 curves displaying that ignition timing for 2 fixed settings of 15° & 23°bTDC. Those curves are easily calculated, for instance the one below is for 21.5°bTDC, the data of which I published earlier on this forum.
![Ignition timing [ms] for a fixed 21.5°bTDC setting.jpg](./download/file.php?id=9075&sid=7ac012e82c9ad786a3ce05f73082d8f0)
- Ignition timing [ms] for a fixed 21.5°bTDC setting.jpg (9.69 KiB) Viewed 42 times
It's just calculated, a mathematical truth, not an ignition advance curve.
Yet obviously, with your green curve you are showing a clear departure from the grey (15° = 1.4mm fixed) curve, showing (for instance) 0.8ms advance at 5000RPM. That green curve depicts an ignition timing that is clearly advanced wrt the 1.4mm fixed curve, as from ~1700RPM onwards. I would estimate your green curve constitutes some 32° (sic!) advancement around 7000RPM, so equivalent to an ignition timing of around 47°bTDC. I see the curve, but are you sure that is what your system does? Are you willing to share empirical data to support your claimed green curve?
At any rate, with your graph you are addressing something highly desirable, at least in principle. You don't want the ignition to happen at some angle °, or mm before TDC, you want it to happen at some time, so ms, before TDC: you want the flame front to advance a significant part into the combustion chamber, so as to optimise the build-up of pressure, to generate the work when the piston will start to move downwards. So that is linked to the speed of the flame front, and the size of the combustion chamber. So ms, not ° or mm. (Although not necessarily a constant time bTDC, the optimum of that time is probably RPM-dependent too.)
But that raises the question: why 1.3ms bTDC? Do you have dyno charts to support that choice, or how else did you come to that value? The advancement your system gives should increase the power of the engine, as from 3kRPM onwards; by how much? I'm just asking, because your claimed timing (green curve) is quite an outstep from convention.