by Blurredman » Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:28 am
Are you talking about the black rubber disc that sits between the crankcases at the top behind the conrod? Yes they can compress and deform a bit but I've re-used them. However, if you have problems I would replace- you can get them on e-Bay.
There are differences to all 250 engines, depending on release and model of bike. It seems like they perfected it as much as they could though with tuning and port timing as much as they think they could though by the time 1989-1991 came around, although there is some variation of barrel height (and therefore port height). But lots of things were changed over the years some small things some big, dependsif you wanted to know something specifically? I have three MZ's @ 250cc base engine, but I have yet to actually try out the MZ TS250 5 speed which apparently is the best. But I would like to try that out for myself. I like the 4 speed Trophy, though it is hard to use sometimes, but I really enjoy my '87 ETZ250 (bored to 298cc), which I don't have a problem with what people call a peaky engine. A bit of tuning and richening of the low RPM range torques it up really nicely in my opinion, with barely any fuel consumption chart degredation. I'm not such a fan of my ETZ251, but it's still a fine bike, but not really 'enjoyable' in the same way as the others - in my opinion. Maybe it's the seating position, or the shortness of the bike. As, just as the engines are all different and have varying degrees of design, the bikes themselves also have different characteristics, which may add or remove to any experience if just comparing the engine alone. The 251 also has a really clunky gearbox (compared to my ETZ250) which I never did get to the bottom of. I think it's just had serious abuse in the past maybe.
Anyway: as for rust marks on your clutch plates and body. You can try and clear them away but in the end, it might just be plain easier to leave it and let the clutch itself rub all this away in the natural process of running the bike. Maybe?